Natural folks to interview in Denver would of course be Mark Cohen from Recreate '68, and the legal director of Colorado ACLU, Mark Silverstein, who has been lecturing/teaching what a person's rights are to protest during the Democratic National Convention this coming August.
You can watch the whole broadcast here, but I am just posting the transcript of the interview with Cohen and Silverstein. (The supplemental links are mine.)
AMY GOODMAN: We’re broadcasting from Denver, Colorado, from the PBS station
KBDI, where Democracy Now! broadcasts here in Denver. Yes, Denver will play host
to the Democratic National Convention this August, and preparations are well
under way for the big event. It remains to be seen whether the Democrats will
ultimately take their fight for a presidential candidate all the way to the
convention. But for many activists tired of the two-party system and the ongoing
war, they will be demonstrating at the convention, regardless of who the final
nominee is.As Denver readies to sign contracts with dozens of security agencies ahead of
the convention, we look at some of the concerns around the rights of the
protesters and how lawyers and activists are preparing to protect demonstrators.Mark Silverstein is on the phone with us, legal director of the ACLU in
Colorado. We’re also joined in the studio at KBDI by Mark Cohen. He is an
organizer with Recreate ’68, a group of activists attempting to greet this
year’s Democratic National Convention with the same demands of accountability
and ending the war that animated protesters in Chicago forty years ago.
We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Mark Cohen, what are your plans for this
convention?MARK COHEN: Thank you, Amy. We plan to have a massive presence during the
Democratic National Convention in August. We will be having a number of major
demonstrations, including on the Sunday, the day before the convention begins,
what will probably be the biggest antiwar march and rally that Denver has seen
at least since Vietnam. We’re also working with some of the major immigrant
rights groups to, on the Tuesday, have what we think will be a very large
immigrant rights march and rally.But we’re not only involved in protest activities. We’re also staging what
we’re calling the Festival of Democracy, which will be a five-day event in
downtown Denver, during which we will have trainings, workshops, teach-ins, and
provide people the opportunity to come together and learn about alternatives to
the two-party system, solutions that communities can provide to their own
problems. We’re also, during that, going to have a 24/7 free health clinic,
legal services, two feedings a day in cooperation with Food Not Bombs and other
services for the community.AMY GOODMAN: And who is “we”?
MARK COHEN: We are Recreate ’68, which is a group of local Denver activists.
We began planning for the Democratic National Convention actually before we
found out that Denver had been given the convention. It looked like a fairly
certain thing. So we’ve been planning for about a year and a half now. We’ve
been talking with the city to try to ensure that people’s First Amendment rights
would be protected during the convention. We’ve been working with national
organizations, among them United for Peace and Justice, CODEPINK and others, as
well as numerous Colorado organizations, to prepare for this event, to try to
use the attention and the excitement and the energy generated by this major
event to kind of kick organizing in Denver up to another level.AMY GOODMAN: Mark Silverstein, you’re legal director of the Colorado ACLU.
What are the city’s plans for these protests?MARK SILVERSTEIN: Well, you’re asking me to tell you the city’s plans, and
unfortunately the city has not responded to some of our requests for information
about those plans. I can tell you that political conventions like this have
historically been marked by struggles over law enforcement’s attempt to balance
interest in security with the First Amendment rights of the public and
protesters. And in the past, that balance has sometimes been subjected to
judicial review, and courts have disagreed with law enforcement about the proper
balance.
And since 9/11, I think the issues have even gotten more intense. We
know in Boston in 2004, the city provided what it called a “demonstration zone”
outside of the convention that the district court said was like a concentration
camp and an affront to the First Amendment. But there wasn’t enough time for the
court to fully evaluate it and issue an order that would remedy the
problems.We have been trying to find out what it will look like, what kind of
regulations will apply to First Amendment activity near the site of the
convention. And so far, Denver has been either unwilling or unable to discuss
any of that in detail, pointing to the Secret Service as the ultimate shot
caller for security at the convention. And the Secret Service has said, well, it
won’t have details to reveal to the public until sometime this summer, maybe as
late as August. And, of course, that might be far too late to have any
negotiation over the arrangements for First Amendment activity and certainly too
late for an opportunity for judicial review. So that’s very much a concern for
us.AMY GOODMAN: I’m looking at a piece just recently in the Denver Post, “No
Cages for DNC Protesters,” that according to Denver City Councilman Charlie
Brown, protesters will not be confined to cages during the Democratic National
Convention. The city wants to get away from the long lines of
shoulder-to-shoulder, riot gear-clad police that typified security, saying, “We
don’t want to provoke violence.” Mark?MARK SILVERSTEIN: And that’s a very commendable sentiment. And, you know, at the ACLU, we certainly hope that what Councilman Brown says will indeed be the
reality. But, you know, there’s a question that I always ask when somebody in
government makes an assurance like that. I ask, “Well, how do they know?”
because when we’ve talked with the city officials or when we’ve read what’s
quoted in the newspaper, the answer always is, “Well, we don’t know yet, because
the Secret Service ultimately makes the decision, and the Secret Service isn’t
saying, at least publicly.”So there’s a rumor that there’s going to be a one-mile radius hard security
perimeter around the convention site. And then you can occasionally read in the
paper, somebody will debunk that as a rumor. It’s not true that there will be
one-mile security zone around the convention, but yet, when you talk to the city
people who ought to know, they say, “Well, we don’t know yet.” And if they don’t
know, then how do they know there won’t be a one-mile security radius? There
must be some plans already formulated.AMY GOODMAN: Keeping protesters one mile away from the Pepsi Center? That’s
where the Democratic Convention is going to be?MARK SILVERSTEIN: That’s correct. That’s correct.
AMY GOODMAN: According to Colorado Confidential, a web publication, the
Denver Police Department is using taxpayer money to buy new security equipment
in preparation for the DNC but is refusing to disclose exactly what the
purchases are, saying that revealing the information would be contrary to the
public interest. Mark Cohen, what do you know about that?MARK COHEN: We do know that the city council has allocated $5 million for new weapons for the Denver Police Department. We know that in St. Paul, they have issued tasers to every single officer on the force. We’re aware that there are new weapons out there that are being ostensibly used for crowd control in places like Iraq. But we’ve seen a report on 60 Minutes, for example, where they were doing field tests with these weapons, and the people they were testing on were dressed as
protesters and carrying protest-type signs. So we have a feeling that the field
tests for these new weapons are going to be at the Democratic National
Convention and possibly the Republican Convention, as well. So, the weapons that
are being designed primarily for military use are going to be used on peaceful,
nonviolent protesters.AMY GOODMAN: One of the things that we’ve seen at the conventions past is the
level of infiltration by police and also surveillance. Now, Mark Cohen, you were
a plaintiff in the Denver spy files case.MARK COHEN: Yes.
AMY GOODMAN: Explain what that was.
MARK COHEN: We discovered in—I believe it was 2001, that the—or maybe earlier
than that, but we discovered that the Denver Police Department had been keeping
what they called “criminal intelligence files” on people who had engaged in no
criminal activity but simply exercised their First Amendment rights in protests
and demonstrations. There were labels on these files, such as “criminal
extremist.” And the information in these files was, first of all, not the kind
of information that had any relationship to criminal activity. They had–people
had written letters to the editors of local papers, and they had stuck these in
files. And they also had a good deal of false information.My wife, who is a middle-aged Jewish woman, was identified as belonging to a
white racist motorcycle gang that dealt in drugs and weapons. So, we’re
obviously very concerned about this, especially because we discovered that these
files were being shared with other law enforcement agencies. And in the
atmosphere after 9/11, this is a very dangerous thing to be identified as a
criminal extremist and as, presumably, a security threat. So we did sue the city
and got out of the suit a change in policy, which prevents the Denver Police
Department from collecting intelligence information on people who are not
actually engaged in criminal activity.AMY GOODMAN: Well, we are going to leave it there for now but certainly will
continue to follow this. Mark Cohen with us from Recreate ’68 and Mark
Silverstein on the line with us, legal director of the Colorado ACLU, I want to
thank you both for being with us.MARK COHEN: Thank you.
|